Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota Motor Corporation (TYO: 7203) has often been referred to as the gold standard of the automotive industry. In the first quarter of 2007, Toyota (NYSE: TM) overtook General Motors Corporation in sales for the first time as the top automotive manufacturer in the world. Toyota reached success in part because of its exceptional reputation for quality and customer care. Despite the global recession and the tough economic times that American auto companies such as General Motors and Chrysler faced in 2009, Toyota enjoyed profits of $16.7 billion and sales growth of 6% that year. However, late 2009 and early 2010 witnessed Toyota’s recall of 8 million vehicles due to unintended acceleration. How could this happen to a company known for quality and structured to solve problems as soon as they arise? To examine this further, one has to understand about the Toyota Production System (TPS).
TPS is built on the principles of “just-in-time” production. In other words, raw materials and supplies are delivered to the assembly line exactly at the time they are to be used. This system has little room for slack resources, emphasizes the importance of efficiency on the part of employees, and minimizes wasted resources. TPS gives power to the employees on the front lines. Assembly line workers are empowered to pull a cord and stop the manufacturing line when they see a problem.
However, during the 1990s, Toyota began to experience rapid growth and expansion. With this success, the organization became more defensive and protective of information. Expansion strained resources across the organization and slowed response time. Toyota’s CEO, Akio Toyoda, the grandson of its founder, has conceded, “Quite frankly, I fear the pace at which we have grown may have been too quick.”
Vehicle recalls are not new to Toyota; after defects were found in the company’s Lexus model in 1989, Toyota created teams to solve the issues quickly, and in some cases the company went to customers’ homes to collect the cars. The question on many people’s minds is, how could a company whose success was built on its reputation for quality have had such failures? What is all the more puzzling is that brake problems in vehicles became apparent in 2009, but only after being confronted by United States transportation secretary Ray LaHood did Toyota begin issuing recalls in the United States. And during the early months of the crisis, Toyota’s top leaders were all but missing from public sight.
The organizational structure of Toyota may give us some insight into the handling of this crisis and ideas for the most effective way for Toyota to move forward. A conflict such as this has the ability to paralyze productivity but if dealt with constructively and effectively, can present opportunities for learning and improvement. Companies such as Toyota that have a rigid corporate culture and a hierarchy of seniority are at risk of reacting to external threats slowly. It is not uncommon that individuals feel reluctant to pass bad news up the chain within a family company such as Toyota. Toyota’s board of directors is composed of 29 Japanese men, all of whom are Toyota insiders. As a result of its centralized power structure, authority is not generally delegated within the company; all U.S. executives are assigned a Japanese boss to mentor them, and no Toyota executive in the United States is authorized to issue a recall. Most information flow is one-way, back to Japan where decisions are made.
Will Toyota turn its recall into an opportunity for increased participation for its international manufacturers? Will decentralization and increased transparency occur? Only time will tell.
- What changes in the organizing facet of planning, organizing, leading, and controlling framework (or, simply, P-O-L-C) framework might you make at Toyota to prevent future mishaps like the massive recalls related to brake and accelerator failures?
- Do you think Toyota’s organizational structure and norms are explicitly formalized in rules, or do the norms seem to be more inherent in the culture of the organization?
- What are the pros and cons of Toyota’s structure?
- What elements of business would you suggest remain the same and what elements might need revising?
- What are the most important elements of Toyota’s organizational structure?
In addition to the resources listed in the acknowledgements page, the following resource was used in this chapter:
- Management Principles (v1.1): Toyota Struggles with Organizational Structure by Lumen Learning is licensed under Creative Commons by-nc-sa 3.0
Anthony, S. (2009). Major League Innovation. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2009/10/major-league-innovation
Cooper, D. G., Edgett, D. J., & Kleinschmidt, D. J. (2000). New problems, new solutions: Making portfolio management more effective. Research Technology Management, 43(2). http://www.stage-gate.net/downloads/working_papers/wp_09.pdf
Dean, T. (2013). Network+ guide to networks, Sixth Edition. Course Technology.
El-Erian, M. A. (2014, June 13). The secret to Southwest’s success. Bloomberg View. http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2014-06-13/the-secret-to-southwest-s-success.
Hammonds, K. H. (2001, February 28). Michael Porter’s big ideas. Fast Company. https://www.fastcompany.com/42485/michael-porters-big-ideas
Morgan, M., Levitt, R. E., & Malek, W. A. (2007). Executing your strategy: How to break it down and get it done. Harvard Business School Publishing.
Porter, M. E. (2001, November 12). Manager’s journal: How to profit from a downturn. Wall Street Journal.
Russo, P.E., & Boor, S. (1993). How fluent is your interface?: designing for international users. Proceedings of the INTERACT ’93 and CHI ’93 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
Scheck, J. (2016, January 14). Oil route forces companies to delay decisions on $380 billion in projects. Wall Street Journal. http://www.wsj.com/articles/oil-rout-forces-companies-to-delay-decisions-on-380-billion-in-projects-1452775590
Seeber, J. (2011). Project selection criteria: How to play it right. International Project Management Association. http:/
This chapter of Project Management is a derivative the following texts:
Essentials of Project Management by Adam Farag is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted.